Source · Interpretation · Clinical caution

Reliable review needs different questions, not one plausible answer.

One agent checks fidelity to the source, another looks for contrary evidence and overinterpretation, and another examines risks in clinical translation. Disagreements remain visible rather than being averaged away. These reviews support scholarly judgment; they are not themselves clinical evidence.

30 individual reviews2 completed review groups1 needs discussion9 revisions needed

ARQ-ECF2F70CFD4D94C7JSON

Completed reviews

Materials reviewed so far

Each record shows what was established and what remains unresolved, rather than only pass or fail.

P0classical-facsimile-alignmentAGCADJ-A4D288C76FC0C415

Use the internal visual workbench to collate 11 normalized lines against public-domain facsimile pages 17–18. Two red regions are agent hints only; zero vertical-text OCR observations do not mean absence of text. Check six items—structure, heading, characters, continuation, printed folio, and reviewer independence—then decide Accept, Reject, or Unclear.

3individual reviews

0further discussion

1revisions needed

facsimile-visual-collator · normalized-text-source-critic · adversarial-provenance-critic

Review limits and record details

Three separate role executions used the same Codex orchestration/provider and inherited model family. Agreement reduces single-prompt error but is not independent external validation.

DNI-A72DE3D921CE4A8E · CFWB-476F7A959EB67E7E

P1japanese-kampo-source-passage-dual-reviewAGADJ-4CF02B267C931650

Using the local full-page workbench, two independent reviewers record append-only judgments on nine candidates bound to eight pages across four official Otsuka and Terasawa J-STAGE papers. They inspect Japanese source and PDF context; derived machine text is neither publisher-PDF bytes nor human transcription, and case response, diagram similarity, or anatomical association cannot be promoted automatically to causality, lineage, or mechanism.

27individual reviews

1further discussion

8revisions needed

source-history-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · clinical-translation-safety-critic

Review limits and record details

Runs used separate agent executions and adversarial roles but the same orchestration/provider context and an undisclosed inherited model family; correlated errors remain possible.

JKRV-F49D900D94A6E905 · JKPW-9590F25F6443E165

Next reviews

11 materials awaiting review

Each item records what will be checked and from which perspectives. Open it for technical details.

P1 · Priority reviewReview five exact-byte passages in page context on diagnostic boundaries, fragmentation, multidisciplinary models, average effects versus heterogeneity, and emotion relations.0/5

source-integrity-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · domain-translation-critic

modern-passage-reviewKIRV-E09121CDAB6DA62C

Agent-role execution has not started; model-family and provider diversity are not yet measured.

P1 · Priority reviewReview five passages on trajectories, heterogeneity, competing explanations, and functional-impairment limits during sugar reduction, together with preprint-to-publication version identity.0/5

source-integrity-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · domain-translation-critic

modern-passage-and-version-reviewAUTRV-C73035B426275E73

Agent-role execution has not started; model-family and provider diversity are not yet measured.

P1 · Priority reviewAdjudicate whether two repository PDFs contain the same published body, what their VOR and CC BY-NC cover signals permit, and whether the service-heterogeneity findings are clinically and organizationally relevant.0/3

source-integrity-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · domain-translation-critic

repository-version-license-relevance-reviewOAIRV-44AFA3192A6BF042

Agent-role execution has not started; model-family and provider diversity are not yet measured.

P1 · Priority reviewAdjudicate identity, version, relevance, exact passages, and license applicability for 14 OSF/MetaArXiv artifacts spanning 15 DOI families. The contextual workbench partitions 16 task-lens units into three high-signal-first, three standard, seven low-specificity controls, and three no-signal controls while binding 33 exact-byte candidates. Priority is not a human relevance judgment.0/14

source-integrity-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · domain-translation-critic

artifact-version-relevance-passage-license-reviewOSFRV-29DAAB7F340EE85E

Agent-role execution has not started; model-family and provider diversity are not yet measured.

P1 · Priority reviewVerify edition-volume-page locators for 22 named historical works, author identity, license, and claim-level traceability.0/1

source-integrity-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · domain-translation-critic

historical-source-auditDSAUD-0E3A36A7D237AA43

Agent-role execution has not started; model-family and provider diversity are not yet measured.

P1 · Priority reviewAdjudicate 24 DOI families across 12 lenses twice independently; route disagreements to the third-party resolution ledger.0/24

source-integrity-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · domain-translation-critic

independent-dual-relevancePP2ADJ-3CD6684075CF3E03

Agent-role execution has not started; model-family and provider diversity are not yet measured.

P1 · Priority reviewIndependently review each of ten top broad HanScope candidates returned by Huang Huang and Huang Longxiang name-bearing queries. Record person/lineage identity relation separately from topical relevance, resolve conflicts through an independent third reviewer, and do not publish a partial observed false-positive rate as the final rate before all ten candidates reach consensus or resolution.0/10

source-integrity-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · domain-translation-critic

authority-identity-and-relevance-dual-calibrationARCP-71F606EFBE3B4745

Agent-role execution has not started; model-family and provider diversity are not yet measured.

P1 · Priority reviewReview 18 passage candidates from ten priority OASIS papers in original-PDF context, including visual inspection of four image-only documents.0/18

source-integrity-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · domain-translation-critic

korean-specialist-passage-reviewOPREV-BC62FC243144B75B

Agent-role execution has not started; model-family and provider diversity are not yet measured.

P1 · Priority reviewAdjudicate six PaperQA questions and 19 passages in source context so the model cannot certify its own benchmark.0/19

source-integrity-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · domain-translation-critic

retrieval-benchmark-goldPQGR-DIAGNOSTIC-BOUNDARY-V1

Agent-role execution has not started; model-family and provider diversity are not yet measured.

P2 · Expansion reviewClassify 182 top candidates across 37 questions as direct, contextual, counterevidence, irrelevant, or uncertain. This may overlap the P1 calibration wave and is not an additive unique-source count.0/182

source-integrity-critic · adversarial-counterevidence-critic · domain-translation-critic

broad-candidate-relevanceQREV-92A16B39C085B730

Agent-role execution has not started; model-family and provider diversity are not yet measured.

Agreement among reviewers does not establish clinical efficacy. 0 review groups are currently eligible to support a paper, and false are cleared for synthesis.